Big Pete
International Captain
- Mar 12, 2008
- 32,078
- 25,670
Save it for PMs you two.
I think it highly unlikely that Newcastle are not paying something towards Boyd simply due to the news release they put out or perhaps it was a journos question they were replying to. In short they said the financial arrangement was private which is what you would expect however I would think if they were not paying out some portion of Boyds salary they would have said so. By doing so they fulfil the secrecy aspect yet indicate they had no more to pay. Like I wrote earlier , Newcastle might think releasing Boyd with a small outlay is better than retaining him when he may or may not be a contributor.Not long after Boyd was photographed on his mid-season holiday, the Knights came out and said that if Boyd left they wouldn't be paying him a cent (but he was welcome to stay and fulfil the contract).
now, obviously i have no idea if they changed their stance, but it could also indicate that we are picking up his full contract value
That's incorrect. I posted it recently...
The example is clearly for 1.5 years, where the full contract value has to be paid between both clubs for the whole period!
What do you mean, they have been wrong before? The November 1st rule abolishment has been on the nrl.com site since 2010, where I got it from many times, after media repeated ad-nauseum the clubs couldn't talk to players before it...You're correct I misread it at the time. a very silly/illogical rule though. In any other job you get paid a redundancy. Not a guaranteed salary.
In the same breath nrl.com have been wrong before (november 1st negotiation window). Even coaches believed that one.
Wrong, Barba was moved on because there was use for him,he was surplus to needs. He was also a financial burden which when removed allows the possible signing of Rod Griffin should he impress. Further to what Shakespeare wrote, should I find myself in a battle of wits, and I find myself half a wit short, I'll be sure to call on you....
Hey Huge, call on me anytime. I am sure you will enjoy the echo.
To say Barba was surplus to our needs is equivalent to what I said. Bennett didn't want him. He wanted Boyd.
Bennett determines our needs now
If only Boyd was a quality prop
So let's look at the recruitment now since Wayne has taken over...
Gains: Adam Blair, James Gavet, Travis Waddell, Joe Boyce, Darius Boyd (all but confirmed)
Losses: Ben Hannant, Martin Kennedy, David Hala, Josh Hoffman, Ben Barba
Got to say, on paper I absolutely loathe it. I try and judge these signings if they were to happen to the Titans or Dragons so if the Broncos somehow manage to be successful next season and the likes of Blair, Gavet & Boyd are able to improve on the efforts we saw from those listed, I'd have to give Wayne all the credit in the world.
But right now, it isn't looking good.
Imagine if this happened under Griffin... :shocked:So let's look at the recruitment now since Wayne has taken over...
Gains: Adam Blair, James Gavet, Travis Waddell, Joe Boyce, Darius Boyd (all but confirmed)
Losses: Ben Hannant, Martin Kennedy, David Hala, Josh Hoffman, Ben Barba
Got to say, on paper I absolutely loathe it. I try and judge these signings if they were to happen to the Titans or Dragons so if the Broncos somehow manage to be successful next season and the likes of Blair, Gavet & Boyd are able to improve on the efforts we saw from those listed, I'd have to give Wayne all the credit in the world.
But right now, it isn't looking good.
Imagine if this happened under Griffin... :shocked:
He somehow managed to over the last 3 years. With all the flip flopping going on around here lately, it'll happen again if we miss the 8 or get bundled out straight away yet again.He won't be able to escape the criticism if we go the same or backwards.