- Jan 25, 2014
- 44,185
- 33,336
That major strike weapon the Broncos can recruit better be Izzy.
If not him, then someone else that's not Gagai.
If not him, then someone else that's not Gagai.
Last edited:
That major strike weapon the Broncos can recruit better be Izzy.
I would love us to get izzy back. However, he will come with a massive price tag, and i reckon he will only cone back to pmay fullback (after being successful in the position in union)
Play Boyd in the centres to replace Hodges after he retires and play Folau at fullback. Done.
Like it or not, Boyd will be our fullback until Bennett retires.
Sorry, but that bold statement is a contradiction in terms. Would Barba be moved on if Boyd wasn't coming, for whom we are possibly paying a large chunk of the cap (undisclosed amount being carried by the Knights...), possibly more than Barba costs?Barba is not being moved on to make room for Boyd, his best opportunity to make the 17 each week would be off the bench, which you just can't afford to do from a salary cap standpoint, especially when there's at least a handful of guys that can fill that spot and be just as, if not more, effective on far less coin. One of Benny's strengths is getting more out of the salary cap, people on here have been complaining about the clubs recruitment and retention for the last 3 years, now something is being done about it and there's still whinging. Our roster and cap position is now looking a lot healthier than it was a month ago.
More ridiculous Foordy facts, ladies and gentleman!
Its not a contradiction because Barba wasn't even playing FB for half the year, despite being signed to play there, and finished the year playing 5/8 and being at least the third choice FB behind Hodges and Hoffman. Boyd isn't taking his spot, he lost it before Boyd even came into the picture.Sorry, but that bold statement is a contradiction in terms. Would Barba be moved on if Boyd wasn't coming, for whom we are possibly paying a large chunk of the cap (undisclosed amount being carried by the Knights...), possibly more than Barba costs?
Let's not pretend WB hasn't moved heaven and earth to accommodate his love child...
I'm happy to see Barba go for the sake of our salary cap, as for better or worse, WB doesn't rate him (second time he doesn't want him), has made it clear who will be in the spine, and Barba isn't of much use elsewhere.
I hope he kills it again where ever he goes, and wish him the best of luck.
As to the cap, I'm sure Gavet, Garbutt and Waddell's salaries are relatively low, and with Hannant + Hala being gone, we can easily cover that.
The question really is how much of Hoffman, Kennedy and Barba's salaries we will be paying, add it to what we're paying Boyd, and see what the result is.
Of course, once the burden of said salaries is off our cap a few years from now, we will be better off, unless we're rewarding Boyd with some obscene coin... :rolleyes:
Barba was moved more because of hoffmans ineptness at five eighth.
Would they? Which ones are they? Clearly you know more than what is in the papers.
He is contracted to us for the next 2 years and no one will take him so he will play where ever the **** he is told to
firstly, it has been widely reported and discussed in this thread even that the broncos have tried to offload him, and can't because no one wants him currently.
More importantly, I didn't say noone would want him like it was just my opinion, I said no one does, as has been stated. And then YOU accuse ME of not reading what I post. My god...
no, it's signing a FB, moving on two FB's who have had opportunities and signing a 5/8.Barba was moved more because of hoffmans ineptness at five eighth.
Think of it this way. If barba is a 5/10 at fb and a 3/10 at 45/8th, and Hoffman is a 1/10 at 5/8th and a 5/10 at fb, we have a better balanced team with Hoffman at fb and barba at 5/8th.
Ftr I don't think anyone is arguing that letting barba go is a bad thing when you account for the fact that we ARE signing Boyd to play fb no matter what. Its the fact that we are signing Boyd in the first place when we had Barba, Milford and Hoffman on the books that is the point of contention. It'd be like us going out now and signing another fullback after we sign Boyd - overkill and unnecessary.
No, he was moved because Hoffman was about the worst five eighth in the team yet was playing five eighth.Barba was moved because he was proving to be a complete liability at the back.
no, it's signing a FB, moving on two FB's who have had opportunities and signing a 5/8.
Bennett has been consistent in recruitment and retention, we now have one FB and one 5/8, not two FB's playing both positions poorly.
.
no, it's signing a FB, moving on two FB's who have had opportunities and signing a 5/8.
Bennett has been consistent in recruitment and retention
If you always do what you always have, then you always get what you've always got.