I'm not saying to not recognise them. Stop reading shit that just ain't there mate.
People in this thread, you included, are arguing Bennett's merits based on competitions he won a very, very, very long time ago. They are using this as part of their platform to say Bennett is the man for the job, and Coach X is no good because he hasn't got X many premierships. I'm saying, I don't think those old competitions mean a thing when it comes to discussing the ability of a coach. All you had to do in 88 was make sure the team weren't drunk or hungover, and you've gone 50% of the way of winning the competition. Get the captain to lay of the durries for a few hours a day, and hell, you might just be the favourites to take it out.
I also couldn't give two hints of a **** about cricket. But I'll use a stupid example those fans use. "He's the next Don Bradman". That would be horrible, the bowlers now days would absolutely destroy a bloke from when Bradman was hitting them.