- May 21, 2013
- 19,705
- 20,981
No I was saying if we didn't get Milford, that it was idea.
You really need to start making a bit more sense with your posts, I have to re-read them 4-5 times and still have no idea what you're saying.. No offence.
No I was saying if we didn't get Milford, that it was idea.
I was thinking about the same dilema yesterday, I almost think Milford would be more dangerous at Fullback, whilst Barba would probably have more touches / impact on the game as Five-Eighth, it all comes down to who has a better passing and kicking game though, I couldn't say for sure who's is better at the moment until I've watched them play together.
Yeah and Im quite surprised at how big Barba is in real life, he might be carrying more weight at the moment but he should be able to handle himself on in the front line better than Milford you would think while still being dangerous as ****
Barba will play in the 1 no doubt about it.
WRT Milford\Barba size, meh, two of the best steps in the game baby!
I like it, plain and simple. We should be player our players in their most potent positions.
listen one thing we should nt mention on here is that we "have options in the halves esp if Milford comes - HOOK will read this idea and start stuffing around with it again like last year
Hunt is a half back and that is it - Milford has the ability to play fullback - halfback - 5/8th or centres - he will be one of the great 5/8th - IMO - Leave Barba at Full back where he can lurk in behind the ruck and pick and choose his time to attack - somehow someone has to get in Hoffmans ears and show him the tries he scored last year from the wing AND with the correct coaching give him a roving role as well to pop up anywhere at anytime - he could become one of the great wingers of all time