Coxy said:
Australia will lose before tea tomorrow and the media will roast po9nting's toss decision, exonerating unjustly the abysmal efforts of Clarke, Haddin and North in particular this test.
Agreed.
Clarke has done the job for Australia before and is very much proven at this level, but the other 2 you mentioned are crap. Even when North makes runs, he strikes at about 35-40. I know it's not limited overs cricket but you've got to keep the scoreboard ticking over, especially when you're number 5 or 6. Haddin can't bat, can't keep, and is a total smart arse. Worst full-time wicket keeper ever to play for Australia.
Hughes at the moment is not ready I agree, but he is only young, and Katich won't be around for too much longer, so he will get his chance. He just needs to bide his time in Sheffield Shield for a couple of years, maybe get the occasional call-up to the Test team, and it will do him the world of good.
Hussey has been the target of criticism lately (from myself included) but he is not the biggest problem. In fact he batted very well today. In saying that, I would swap him around with Clarke, I reckon Hussey is the perfect number 5 batsman.
So in summing up, heading over to New Zealand, drop Haddin and North, swap Hussey and Clarke. Hartley in for Haddin, pluck someone from obscurity for North.