He ran away twice that I can recall, but that's not the reason I said this as I mentioned earlier. It does however, emphasise the point I am trying to make about putting the effort in, besides how crap his defensive positioning at the back was for most of the season.How many times was that specifically?
He may not have performed to his perceived potential but that doesn't necessarily mean Kurt Gidley out-performed him.
A lot of Knights fans didn't think much of Kidley's season either.
On Barba he actually saved more tries than any other fullback this year.
I'm struggling to see your point.
I gave two examples which is more than I can say for Kurt.
I don't understand where you're coming from on Boyd not doing his job. Even during his 'quiet' games, Boyd would get through as much work as Kidley and was rarely a liability at the back. I cannot say the same for Mamo who physically didn't appear to be ready to handle the week to week grind and has issues with his hands.
I don't have a dog in the fight between Boyd and Barba but this point about Kidley being a better option has no basis as far as I can tell.
Porthoz said:Kidley isn't worth much nowadays, but I dare you to find anyone saying he didn't try and give his best.
Kidley isn't worth much nowadays, but I dare you to find anyone saying he didn't try and give his best.
Don't you remember? He ran away from the ball once or twice. Something Kurt Gidley never had to do whilst sitting on the sideline for ages every year.
It's not about trying harder, it's about not trying enough. There is a huge difference!Point taken.
However, I don't believe that means that Kurt Gidley was better last season or deserved to be selected over Boyd. That would be like arguing that since Jarryd Hayne wasn't performing to potential in 2010-2013 he should have been dropped for Justin Hunt or somebody of that ilk because they try harder.
On the surface, Bennett was completely justified to retain Boyd at fullback.
It's not about trying harder, it's about not trying enough. There is a huge difference!
I'm not going to replace a quality player just because he hasn't shown the form he is capable of, or because there is another one that works harder.
I will however, kick a player out of the team as soon as he's not putting in the effort that is minimally required.
It wasn't just the bombs he ran away from. It's the tackles he didn't even try to do, the chases he didn't attempt, and the passivity of his game in general most of the season. He just looked like he didn't want to be there... and whatever reasons or justifications he may have had for it, Bennett should've put someone there that did want to play and give his best!
@Cult3 , you should really leave this conversation to the grown-ups... it's embarrassing to read your attempts at sarcasm.
Has the argument gotten down to who ran away from high kicks more out of Barba and Boyd?
I vote Barba ran away more
Porthoz said:I will however, kick a player out of the team as soon as he's not putting in the effort that is minimally required.
He refused to peel them because everyone knows they're cut into quarters.Bennett didn't drop Boyd in under 8's when he refused to peel the oranges at half time, let's just stick with Barba, we don't need favouritism like that around the playing group.
He refused to peel them because everyone knows they're cut into quarters.
Yeah but the skin can serve as a bogan mouth guard.m8
Best served in quarters without the skin, you heard it here first.
I heard he ran out of puff early so Bennett pulled him off at halftime. #oldybutagoodyHe refused to peel them because everyone knows they're cut into quarters.