NEWS Judiciary: Live blog - Carrigan Four Week Suspension

360 finally show the McGuire tackle and you can hear Anasta gasp at how bad it is... but they don't spend any time talking about it.

So apparently there's no need to show an example of a previous hip drop tackle and explain why Pat's is apparently worse and deserves a higher grading... fuckwits
 
360 finally show the McGuire tackle and you can hear Anasta gasping at how bad it is... but they don't spend any time talking about it.

So apparently there's no need to show an example of a previous hip drop tackle and explain why Pat's is apparently worse and deserves a higher grading... fuckwits
And still people try and argue this is coordinated and orchestrated…
 
effectively we asked for 2 weeks ... the NRL asked for 6
Sounds like we went for a Grade 2 charge... probably should've went for a Grade 3... no way will the judiciary accept a Grade 2

Alternatively Ghabar is thinking we ask for 2 weeks, they ask for 5-6, let's split the difference and go for 4 weeks.

Does he realise he's not defending a Sydney team this week??
 
6:50pm: Ghabar said there was no comparison to the tackle by McGuire on Addo-Carr last season, which forced the Melbourne winger from the field for seven minutes and cost the Dragons forward a five-match ban.

"This was, with respect, at least reckless," Ghabar said of the McGuire tackle. "It was precisely what Mr Annesley talks about in his memorandum - the full weight of player McGuire was on the lower leg.


He said the difference between that tackle and the tackle by player Carrigan was three-fold:

  • McGuire lands directly on the foot [of Addo-Carr], it was his full weight unlike player Carrigan, whose weight landed on the ground.
  • There was direct force involved and certainly that was the intent of the tackler
  • The contribution of fellow Dragons tackler Andrew McCullough was a "positive" in that he pulled Addo-Carr forward and to the side, which allowed McGuire to remove himself from the tackle.
 
6.50pm: Ghabar said there was no comparison to the tackle by McGuire on Addo-Carr last season, which forced the Melbourne winger from the field for seven minutes and cost the Dragons forward a five-match ban.

"This was, with respect, at least reckless," Ghabar said of the McGuire tackle. "It was precisely what Mr Annesley talks about in his memorandum - the full weight of player McGuire was on the lower leg.

He said the difference between that tackle and the tackle by player Carrigan was three-fold:

  • McGuire lands directly on the foot [of Addo-Carr], it was his full weight unlike player Carrigan, whose weight landed on the ground.
  • There was direct force involved and certainly that was the intent of the tackler
  • The contribution of fellow Dragons tackler Andrew McCullough was a "positive" in that he pulled Addo-Carr forward and to the side, which allowed McGuire to remove himself from the tackle.
 
7:05pm: Ghabar suggested that the penalty imposed on Carrigan should be no greater than two matches.

"What player McGuire did himself in that tackle compared to what player Carrigan did in the case before you is a higher level. They are not even in the same ball park," he said. "It is carless, but not reckless."
 
7.27: The hearing adjourned

7:12pm: Knowles responded by pointing out that Carrigan did not need to join the tackle on Hastings as he was already held by two other Broncos defenders.
 

Active Now

  • leith1
  • Ghost of Vlansys
  • Aldo
  • The Strapper
  • Reds2011
  • broncsgoat
  • DrGee
  • TimWhatley
  • LittleDavey
  • broncos4life
  • Wolfie
  • 1910
  • bb_gun
  • Behind enemy lines
  • Harry Sack
  • BroncoFan94
  • Justwin
  • ChewThePhatt
  • Redfern_1980
  • The True King
... and 20 more.
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.