1
1910
International Rep
- Apr 14, 2013
- 15,820
- 20,011
It comes down to exposure as well if you don't have rich benefactors, no FTA games limits it severely. If you were a sponsor would you pay for a player who is on FTA almost every week or a player who is lucky to be on tv 2 or 3 times a year.
Its not a go at the Broncos mate they play the cards they are dealt, the decks just stacked to favor certain clubs.
I don't understand what rich benefactors means sorry? Free to air games I don't think would make any difference.
Raiders player wants some third party deals.
Manager approaches 3 companies- for arguments sake- Coke, Apple and Ford. They all agree to use said Raiders players for endorsements.
Those three payments would be not included in the cap- again for arguments sake none of those companies are Raiders' sponsors.
Manager has done his job and it doesn't matter if the player lives in Canberra or Townsville. Cowboys don't get FTA games or have any 'rich benefactors yet Thurston has plenty of third party deals- Skins and Skytrans.
Blame lazy mangers not location.