Ari Gold
Master Baiter
Contributor
- Mar 13, 2008
- 6,522
- 2,807
Wallace is good at what he does, better than good actually. Problem is, he's limited in what he can do. He doesn't really have the ability to stamp himself into the game in one play, not the way that Thurston or Lockyer can. When NSW first brought in Barrett, i was amazed it was for Campese and not Wallace. Campese has the ability to stamp his influence on a game in a single play, whereas Wallace is more of an organizer. Problem is, I don't think his long kicking game is strong enough to play the Organizer role effectively enough. That's why I think Noddy is a much better choice.
And yes, he did play well in Origin 1 last year, and he is quite good behind a strong pack. But, most halves are. Not all, but the good ones at club level. IMO, to be successful at Origin, you need to be able to have a say in the game when the forwards aren't laying down the best platform. Thurston and Lockyer and Langer have, Johns has, I think Campese has the potential to. Wallace IMO, doesn't have it in him.
And yes, he did play well in Origin 1 last year, and he is quite good behind a strong pack. But, most halves are. Not all, but the good ones at club level. IMO, to be successful at Origin, you need to be able to have a say in the game when the forwards aren't laying down the best platform. Thurston and Lockyer and Langer have, Johns has, I think Campese has the potential to. Wallace IMO, doesn't have it in him.