Alec
International Rep
- Mar 4, 2008
- 19,403
- 12,529
Because we are buying him to play in the halves?
[OFFICIAL] Anthony Milford to Broncos
- Thread starter Big Pete
- Start date
- Status
Because we are buying him to play in the halves?
- Jan 25, 2013
- 25,617
- 29,896
Did you just seriously just post a link to a file on your desktop?
- Aug 5, 2013
- 4,112
- 2,738
Errr I'm not sure what I did. The moments gone now
- Apr 9, 2012
- 12,617
- 14,356
Yes ......it appears as though David inadvertently did. :redface:
Lol this post makes posting on the broncos forums all the worth it.
honestly, it amuses me that some people actually believe the broncos have not been involved in the cockle mammy stories being released.
On a slightly different topic, another bronco fan commented on watching the broncos on Friday night every night, and I let it slide as I foolishly believed someone would pick up on reason here re Milford.
but on the broncos fta topic.
There sucking on fta every Friday night contributed to rugby leagues brand being damaged.
also they are the late game in sydney so no I don't watch them. And I don't really care who gets that death slot it's probably the worst slot if you have foxtel.
anyway best of luck in 2014, fans obviously have nothing to do with the actions of clubs, and I like you hope we all get to enjoy our footy.
- Aug 5, 2013
- 4,112
- 2,738
Don't be too hard on me guys .i did manage to fix it ( for which I'm quite proud) luckily my PC has an alias.
Broncoman
State of Origin Rep
- Oct 9, 2011
- 7,691
- 1,118
[MENTION=8480]papabear[/MENTION]
There is nothing wrong about adding comments and having an opinion but can you tone it down a bit please mate?. This is a Broncos forum so obviously the posts will be from a Broncos perspective or bias don't act surprised about it.
Kind regards
There is nothing wrong about adding comments and having an opinion but can you tone it down a bit please mate?. This is a Broncos forum so obviously the posts will be from a Broncos perspective or bias don't act surprised about it.
Kind regards
Broncoman
State of Origin Rep
- Oct 9, 2011
- 7,691
- 1,118
This is how Kent writes an article
My computer isn't showing the image and didn't before. What is the picture?
Xavier
NYC Player
- Mar 24, 2013
- 176
- 58
It is funny seeing all the Raiders fans on here.
And it's even funnier when they think offering Milford stupid money has any bearing on the Broncos whatsoever.
It's win, win for the Broncos and lose, lose for the Raiders.
1. He signs for Brisbane on a reasonable contract = Win for Brisbane.
2. He signs for the Raiders for $1M a season = another win for the Broncos because they've forced a rival club to pay massive overs for an untested player.
3. He signs for Brisbane on a reasonable contract = A lose for the Raiders.
4. He signs for the Raiders for $1M a season = another lose for the Raiders as they have just committed massive money to an unworthy player, which is sure to created jealousy and discontent amongst the playing group.
The only people who aren't scoffing at offering a 19 year old that kind of money are the Raiders.
And it's even funnier when they think offering Milford stupid money has any bearing on the Broncos whatsoever.
It's win, win for the Broncos and lose, lose for the Raiders.
1. He signs for Brisbane on a reasonable contract = Win for Brisbane.
2. He signs for the Raiders for $1M a season = another win for the Broncos because they've forced a rival club to pay massive overs for an untested player.
3. He signs for Brisbane on a reasonable contract = A lose for the Raiders.
4. He signs for the Raiders for $1M a season = another lose for the Raiders as they have just committed massive money to an unworthy player, which is sure to created jealousy and discontent amongst the playing group.
The only people who aren't scoffing at offering a 19 year old that kind of money are the Raiders.
Last edited:
Danoz Direct
NRL Captain
- Oct 12, 2013
- 3,800
- 1,285
Any news about Milford?
Xavier
NYC Player
- Mar 24, 2013
- 176
- 58
Salford offered SBW $1M a season to play for them in the Super league before he signed with the Roosters at the start of the year.
And the NRL didn't have a problem registering SBW on a $500k contract.
The Broncos could easily sign Milford for $300-400k without any NRL 'investigation'.
And the NRL didn't have a problem registering SBW on a $500k contract.
The Broncos could easily sign Milford for $300-400k without any NRL 'investigation'.
- Oct 17, 2013
- 12,840
- 14,848
The Roosters could pay anything for anybody without any kind of investigation though.
- May 21, 2013
- 19,705
- 20,981
I think we'll hear within a fortnight once Anthony is back from the RLWC, whenever that will be.
Xavier
NYC Player
- Mar 24, 2013
- 176
- 58
Whether we get Milford or not, it's still an exciting time as a Broncos supporter.
We've added some size up front which is what we were lacking.
We have a new strength and conditioning coach (we looked unfit last season).
We have some more depth in the backline.
JYY return?
The prospect of Ben Barba getting back to his best football.
Brian Edwards as a scout to try and keep the promising young talent in Brisbane.
And who knows, Maybe Strasser or Taylor could stand up and be the new DCE?
And we have a heap of cap space should a marquee player pop up for whatever reason.
We've added some size up front which is what we were lacking.
We have a new strength and conditioning coach (we looked unfit last season).
We have some more depth in the backline.
JYY return?
The prospect of Ben Barba getting back to his best football.
Brian Edwards as a scout to try and keep the promising young talent in Brisbane.
And who knows, Maybe Strasser or Taylor could stand up and be the new DCE?
And we have a heap of cap space should a marquee player pop up for whatever reason.
Last edited:
- Status
