Out of the 8, second year in a row... And we're in!

[radicaljack]

Looking at the ladder and draw, I would say that 30 points is going to be the cut off this year. Eels, Warriors and Cowboys have easier draws. Need to win 4/5 to make it, unless two of those teams really shit the bed.

 

[Ari Gold]

Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row

Lol at people talking like we are a chance of making the finals. We are not.

Look forward to 2015 instead. That could be our year.

 

[_wwong]

Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row

Lol at people talking like we are a chance of making the finals. We are not.

Look forward to 2015 instead. That could be our year.

some players think the broncos will give the finals a real shake. surely they know they have to make the 8 first. delusional.

from watching qcup today even those sides look faster and more structured than the broncos.

 

[CaptainHook]

Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row

Warriors will get there. Most of the other sides seem to be going up a gear and the Broncos are waning.

 

[Alec]

Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row

Parra might too...they still play the Raiders twice.

Parra will actually likely finish ahead of us.

 

[Big Pete]

Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row

Looking at the ladder and draw, I would say that 30 points is going to be the cut off this year. Eels, Warriors and Cowboys have easier draws. Need to win 4/5 to make it, unless two of those teams really sh#t the bed.

It was always going to be really tough once we dropped that game against Penrith.

Shouldn't have dropped the game against Cronulla either, but that's another story altogether.

Still, anything is possible and you never know. If they can upset Canterbury & Souths, they maybe in with a shot but it's difficult envisioning them finding the form they require to beat both.

 

[Alec]

Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row

Bulldogs should be the easiest of the "tough matches" we had left since 2 weeks ago, but they are also the team whose forwards always seem to dominate ours.

 

[uptheguts]

Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row

Hodges said post match something to the effect that we have a great team"on paper" , and if we got to the finals we could really give it a shake. I wish this were true ,but the more I see them play the more obvious it it's to me that we lack the players to really be competitive with the better teams at this business end of the season. No team can play to the absolute best of their ability every week. And that's what we would have to do to make the eight,let alone be a force in the finals. Let's face it we lack size,pace , and organization.I think one measure of a teams class is its ability to sore tries from their own half.We rarely do that.Barba was bought into the team do give us more in that department but has been a real disappointment. We do have some very talented players, ( Hunt,Parker , Hodges,Copley), Just not enough of them.IMO we won't make the eight.

 

[Ari Gold]

Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row

IMO we are a team whose whole adds up to less than the sum of its parts. Whereas a team like the Dogs is very much the opposite.

The reason too is obvious - coaching. That's where I'm hoping WB will have his biggest effect.

 

[jarro65]

Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row

IMO we are a team whose whole adds up to less than the sum of its parts. Whereas a team like the Dogs is very much the opposite.

The reason too is obvious - coaching. That's where I'm hoping WB will have his biggest effect.

agreed.

I know they aren't really allowed to say so in public.... but I really would like to know what the players think of their current gameplan ?

 

[ivanhungryjak]

Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row

So all we need is for the Raiders to beat the Eels and the Sharks to beat the Warriors by more than 11 and we're back in the eight!

 

[Foordy]

Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row

So all we need is for the Raiders to beat the Eels and the Sharks to beat the Warriors by more than 11 and we're back in the eight!

thats not going to happen ... the Raiders couldn't beat an under 8s team ATM

 

[Porthoz]

Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row

Haha... The Raiders winning. You're a funny bloke.

 

[Kaz]

Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row

I don't think we'll win another game this year.

Are you one of those magazine 1900 number psychics.

 

[Kaz]

Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row

So all we need is for the Raiders to beat the Eels

The only way the Raiders will beat the Eels, is if the Eels forfeit the game.

 

[Ari Gold]

Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row

Call me crazy but I actually think the Raiders are going to win tonight.

 

[Foordy]

Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row

Call me crazy but I actually think the Raiders are going to win tonight.

your crazy :takdir:

 

[Big Pete]

Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row

Ari is crazy.

Crazy like a fox!