PRE-GAME PRE-GAME [Round 4, 2023] Broncos vs Dolphins

Status
Not open for further replies.
One thing I know is there would be lawyers compiling all this evidence for the eventual class action suit. The NRL can crap on about player safety as much as they want but when they are eventually sued by former players a good defence attorney will show all of these examples and ask them to tell the court exactly how seriously they were actually taking player safety.
These examples have been tested at a judicial hearing and legally resolved. Some of these examples are precedent but are not evidence themselves. The nrl has no vicarious liability here. It's a contact sport.
 
Just had a look at the Dolphins forum and the first few things I've seen are them calling Carrigan overrated and saying Mam can't tackle. So they've either been watching footy for three weeks or they are just idiots?
 
Ezra Mam
50 tackles
83.3 efficiency

Isaiya Katoa
44 tackles
80 efficiency

Yeah Mam can't tackle
 
  • Like
Reactions: 007
These examples have been tested at a judicial hearing and legally resolved. Some of these examples are precedent but are not evidence themselves. The nrl has no vicarious liability here. It's a contact sport.
I'm not sure what point you are trying to make. The NRL is no different to any business and it is all about policy and practice. You can have policies in place saying we have a zero tolerance policy for racism but that won't mean shit when you are at fair work if there is evidence of your employees saying racist shit that is unpunished.

It is no different here. The NRL can say they are taking concussion seriously, have 11 day stand downs for concussion etc. but if you have enough evidence showing they aren't punishing the offenders adequately then you are fucked.
 
Just had a look at the Dolphins forum and the first few things I've seen are them calling Carrigan overrated and saying Mam can't tackle. So they've either been watching footy for three weeks or they are just idiots?
Probably bots. 😂
 
There is no way that Kaufusi doesn't get off because the NRL need him to play for their manufactured bullshit and the media have paved the way for this not to be an outrage when he is cleared at the judiciary.

Honestly when he is cleared I would be calling for the club to rest Reynolds from this game. Kaufusi is a grub and a dg shot merchant and could potentially end Reynolds career or rule him out for the season at the very least. I would rather lose to The than have that happen. Kaufusi is a shit stain on the game and the sooner he retires the better.
 
My issue is the calls that Kaufusi should be downgraded because Suaali’s doesn’t make Kaufusi’s charge wrong. Both should be 3 weeks but the judiciary fucked up, so what we now need to make that tackle just a fine for the rest of the year? Is this how precedents are going to work? Find a time where the MRC was soft because of incompetence or jersey bias and then you are sweet?

You are right that both should be bans, but setting the precedent on one gives the other a get out.
 
Just had a look at the Dolphins forum and the first few things I've seen are them calling Carrigan overrated and saying Mam can't tackle. So they've either been watching footy for three weeks or they are just idiots?
The Dolphins have a forum?
 

"mouth watering"

1094365
 
LOL one of the pricks reckons Mam was faking getting injured.
 
Omg I so hope he plays! But this is probably just a Bennett plan to mess with our head pre game. Get us overconfident thinking we're playing Milf.
That would mean Bennett would have to acknowledge to himself he bought a lemon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Active Now

  • RolledOates
  • Porthoz
  • Lurker
  • GCBRONCO
  • marw
  • Xzei
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.