M
m1c
NRL Player
- Mar 16, 2008
- 1,655
- 17
Coxy said:So you're happy for a convicted attempted murderer to earn big bucks, live a lavish lifestyle, big house etc...while the bloke that's done no wrong is slaving away as a labourer or whatever and struggling to pay the bills?
Just because this guy can kick a footy, run and tackle shouldn't give him privileges above anyone else. His ability to commit a heinous crime negates his ability to play football. He has no right to use them for profit.
In fact, I would say any criminal has no right to earn more than an average wage. Anything earnt above that should go to their victims' families. For life.
I can definitely understand how this is seen as unfair. However, that is life, you don't get a job on good will.
I've got no problems with convicted fellons returning to the workforce provided a) the subjects skills are benefitting society and b) his career is not in conflict with his crime.
Through Metcalf gaining respectable employment and increasing his socioeconomic status his chances of re-offending drop. You have not even even considered the potential generational flow on effect.
It's massive. Now he's out of the socioeconomic doldrums the chances of his children straying down the wrong path drop dramatically. His kids will have a better upbringing, they'll be more likely to seek higher education and will be less reliant on society for support. The end result? There's a few more people less likely to bash a pregnant lady. Society is better for it.