Allan Langer charged with drink-driving

Huge, mate you are clearly not understanding so I won't bother much further. But I will ask this question - do you not think for one second that the Broncos players and officials would have something incorporated into their code of conduct that prohibits them from behaving this way? Maybe (and it's very very possible) the views of the general public did not get considered at all in the decision to stand Alf down. The Broncos obviously have standards of their staff and I am sure drink driving is a sackable offence in their eyes, no matter what the public thinks.
 
Huge mate, I know where you're coming from... I've always said I don't like the role model business myself but unfortunately that is just the WAY IT IS.
I myself have an extreme dislike for it - to take it from a different angle I hate how celebrities are treated by the public... I know they get paid well but I wish people would leave them the hell alone.
Anyway, things must be taken into context - we ALL KNOW what the RL media crapola and RL PR has been over the past few seasons. Take Matty for example - was the sacking by NINE the right decision? of course it was.
Same for Alfie I'm afraid.
 
Huge if Alf gets sacked it won't be a decision taken from being judged by the Broncos it will be a business decision based on how much damage is being done to the Broncos brand.
 
Did anyone else while reading Huges rant picture him in a Head Masters cloak, looking over his glasses while holding a cane hahahaha
 
Firstly I'll deal with how I view myself and my capacity to reason and understand. It's true I have above average intelligence and above average abilities. These observations are not mine but the view of the many who have tested me. That being the case it follows that there are many who feel inadequate when engaging with me. This inadequacy cannot be blamed on me because it is caused by an unflattering but accurate self evaluation.

Secondly, my views are seldom a rant. They are very nicely expressed, considered and well written. No surprise there.

Thirdly, I do not insult those who respond in a thinking manner. I also do not insult others for self-aggrandisement. I have no need for such banality. For some it is the lingua franca , the bridge between us if you like.

Fourthly , I am able to differentiate between what I'd like to believe is a widespread and commonly held belief and with the common view actually held.

Lastly I will point out the blatantly obvious ( for the reason most bright ones amongst you will appreciate ) and say, justice for Allan Langer will be decided by fully matured people not by some inexperienced reactionaries . Although you (picture yourself here if you like, make it personal,get angry and hostile) disagree and want to make it an emotive,confused and ill-considered response cool heads (unlike yours) will decide his fate.

You people call them old people, I call them contemporarys.
 
Does anyone know if he has signed a contract and what that entails? Maybe in his work agreement contract it states he must adhere to the same standards as the players?
 
Huge. said:
Firstly I'll deal with how I view myself and my capacity to reason and understand. It's true I have above average intelligence and above average abilities. These observations are not mine but the view of the many who have tested me. That being the case it follows that there are many who feel inadequate when engaging with me. This inadequacy cannot be blamed on me because it is caused by an unflattering but accurate self evaluation.

Secondly, my views are seldom a rant. They are very nicely expressed, considered and well written. No surprise there.

Thirdly, I do not insult those who respond in a thinking manner. I also do not insult others for self-aggrandisement. I have no need for such banality. For some it is the lingua franca , the bridge between us if you like.

Fourthly , I am able to differentiate between what I'd like to believe is a widespread and commonly held belief and with the common view actually held.

Lastly I will point out the blatantly obvious ( for the reason most bright ones amongst you will appreciate ) and say, justice for Allan Langer will be decided by fully matured people not by some inexperienced reactionaries . Although you (picture yourself here if you like, make it personal,get angry and hostile) disagree and want to make it an emotive,confused and ill-considered response cool heads (unlike yours) will decide his fate.

You people call them old people, I call them contemporarys.
WOW.
You are so up yourself, you must think your gods gift to earth, news flash you are not.
The entire post you just made revolves around you saying how awesome you think you are and how all of us are a level below you. I would love to meet you some time, oh higher one.
 
I'm smarter than a hamster, does that count huge??
 
Huge. said:
Firstly I'll deal with how I view myself and my capacity to reason and understand. It's true I have above average intelligence and above average abilities. These observations are not mine but the view of the many who have tested me. That being the case it follows that there are many who feel inadequate when engaging with me. This inadequacy cannot be blamed on me because it is caused by an unflattering but accurate self evaluation.

Secondly, my views are seldom a rant. They are very nicely expressed, considered and well written. No surprise there.

Thirdly, I do not insult those who respond in a thinking manner. I also do not insult others for self-aggrandisement. I have no need for such banality. For some it is the lingua franca , the bridge between us if you like.

Fourthly , I am able to differentiate between what I'd like to believe is a widespread and commonly held belief and with the common view actually held.

Lastly I will point out the blatantly obvious ( for the reason most bright ones amongst you will appreciate ) and say, justice for Allan Langer will be decided by fully matured people not by some inexperienced reactionaries . Although you (picture yourself here if you like, make it personal,get angry and hostile) disagree and want to make it an emotive,confused and ill-considered response cool heads (unlike yours) will decide his fate.

You people call them old people, I call them contemporarys.

Book smarts Vs Street smarts..
 
If anyone's watched Malcolm in the Middle, think Jason Alexander's character, the crazy genius that everybody hates...that's Huge ;-)

Huge is right though. It won't be us making the decision. And it won't be Huge. It'll be someone who understands the football-business-media-public relationship.
 
Coxy said:
Huge is right though. It won't be us making the decision. And it won't be Huge. It'll be someone who understands the football-business-media-public relationship.

You mean to say that Huge doesn't understand everything there is to understand about everything? Codswallop!
 
Hmmm, I might be in trouble for referring to huge with a small `h', is that overly demeaning to one of such hugeness?
 
Huge. said:
Firstly I'll deal with how I view myself and my capacity to reason and understand. It's true I have above average intelligence and above average abilities. These observations are not mine but the view of the many who have tested me. That being the case it follows that there are many who feel inadequate when engaging with me. This inadequacy cannot be blamed on me because it is caused by an unflattering but accurate self evaluation.

Secondly, my views are seldom a rant. They are very nicely expressed, considered and well written. No surprise there.

Thirdly, I do not insult those who respond in a thinking manner. I also do not insult others for self-aggrandisement. I have no need for such banality. For some it is the lingua franca , the bridge between us if you like.

Fourthly , I am able to differentiate between what I'd like to believe is a widespread and commonly held belief and with the common view actually held.

Lastly I will point out the blatantly obvious ( for the reason most bright ones amongst you will appreciate ) and say, justice for Allan Langer will be decided by fully matured people not by some inexperienced reactionaries . Although you (picture yourself here if you like, make it personal,get angry and hostile) disagree and want to make it an emotive,confused and ill-considered response cool heads (unlike yours) will decide his fate.

You people call them old people, I call them contemporarys.

And I call you a douche [icon_razz1
 
lynx000 said:
Hmmm, I might be in trouble for referring to huge with a small `h', is that overly demeaning to one of such hugeness?
How dare you not capitlise HUGE's name, he is a level above all us mere mortals, he is intelligent and has amazing ability according to all those around him who have tested him.
 

Active Now

  • Foordy
  • Wolfie
  • Bucking Beads
  • GCBRONCO
  • Scorchie
  • Xzei
  • TwoLeftFeet
  • Sproj
  • broncsgoat
  • TimWhatley
  • Payneinthehaas
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.