Dexter
State of Origin Rep
Contributor
- Mar 26, 2008
- 7,239
- 5,607
How is it possible this fucker could not keep but can bat like this.
India once again doing as they please.
India once again doing as they please.
Dexter
State of Origin Rep
Contributor
- Mar 26, 2008
- 7,239
- 5,607
Green bowling pies
BroncsFan
International Rep
Contributor
- Jul 28, 2016
- 19,748
- 29,252
True shouldn't he be off the field in batting for as long as he was off the field whilst fielding??
Wasn't Warner not allowed to open in the day/night test for exactly that reason.
Aussies batted for 80 odd overs so I wouldve thought he'd have to wait the same amount of time?
Last edited:
Bull Shark
State of Origin Rep
- Jun 4, 2008
- 5,975
- 5,163
Maybe if can we set them 700 to win in the fourth innings at the Gabba we’ll be a chance.. but then again, they’ll still find a way
Last edited:
Sproj
Immortal
Senior Staff
- Sep 6, 2013
- 50,603
- 61,106
It is a good question isn't it. Also, why was he able to bat at 5? Is there a law change I am not aware of (there genuinely might be).
The True King
NRL Player
- Apr 6, 2018
- 1,538
- 1,558
I think the rule is different when it comes to keeper. Something about being a specialist fielding position.
On another note, if Paine gives the new ball to Starc I may actually bring forward my PaineOut agenda and give Lyon a little break.
1
1910
International Rep
- Apr 14, 2013
- 14,597
- 17,886
On going debate today here. Lalor is going nuts- but my point is how is it any different to 1000000 times a sub fielder has been used and then a guy still bats?
Abbott fielded yesterday.
Last edited:
Fitzy
NRL Captain
- Sep 10, 2018
- 3,962
- 5,560
See ya later the chubby little fucker didn’t even get his ton less go
The True King
NRL Player
- Apr 6, 2018
- 1,538
- 1,558
Live or die by the sword.
Stupid shot.
Stupid shot.
B
Brent81
Made Legal Threat to BHQ
- Oct 31, 2012
- 1,916
- 887
What’s Indian for “**** off slogger....hit that for six”....sorry that’s probably racist somehow
BroncsFan
International Rep
Contributor
- Jul 28, 2016
- 19,748
- 29,252
Shouldn't it be even more stringent for keeper??
Like couldn't a team just have a specialist keeper as 12th man??
Sproj
Immortal
Senior Staff
- Sep 6, 2013
- 50,603
- 61,106
About time his luck ran out.
This does set an interesting precedent though. Just sub in a genuine keeper in the field but have a better batsman in the named side. It is super dodgy.
This does set an interesting precedent though. Just sub in a genuine keeper in the field but have a better batsman in the named side. It is super dodgy.
1
1910
International Rep
- Apr 14, 2013
- 14,597
- 17,886
The injury has to be during the game. Sub fielders aren't new.
Again Abbott fielded yesterday for Australia and whoever he came on for still batted.
Last edited:
BroncsFan
International Rep
Contributor
- Jul 28, 2016
- 19,748
- 29,252
"Oooo that one got my finger, better go off till I need to have a bat"
Sproj
Immortal
Senior Staff
- Sep 6, 2013
- 50,603
- 61,106
Thank you once again for stating the obvious. I know he got hit on his arm and I am not saying they did this deliberately but there is absolutely zero doubt they benefitted form taking advantage of the situation, just like the Storm and the HIA.
Also, they are playing pretty dirty this game with the deliberate time wasting from the 'racism' and constant malleting of the pitch yesterday.
Bull Shark
State of Origin Rep
- Jun 4, 2008
- 5,975
- 5,163
1
1910
International Rep
- Apr 14, 2013
- 14,597
- 17,886
You're the one that keeps asking and obviously doesn't know, don't blame me.
1
1910
International Rep
- Apr 14, 2013
- 14,597
- 17,886
Why would you bother, you could do it with anyone and teams don't. Again why is it any different to Abbott being on the field?
Did Australia do that on purpose?
A fielder got hurt a sub came on and fielded, he still bats it's happened so many times in cricket.
