broncsgoat
State of Origin Captain
Contributor
- Oct 28, 2013
- 11,813
- 12,809
Did i fucking say that?So Milford has been performing better?
Did i fucking say that?So Milford has been performing better?
I don't keep my compendium of all bhqers statements about players handy so all I can go on is this thread. Looked to me like old mate was copping it for saying Dearden's been average so far which isn't anywhere near saying he's definitively bad. Milford's also been poor the last few years for various reasons but it's true to say he has demonstrated he can perform at a level that Dearden hasn't shown us yet.Are they fighting words?!?! Who am I kidding, I win all my fights by 100m
I can’t be bothered going back into the annals, but I know for a fact old mate @broncsgoat has been sinking the boot into Dearden since he made his debut. Hasn’t had a good word to say about him, constantly critical.
I just fail to see how anyone can declare him good, bad or indifferent after 17 games, yet in the same breath and during literally the same period of time, excuse others poor form, laying it squarely at the feet of the coach.
As far as I am concerned, if he looks shit in the environment he’s been in, I am willing to give him time to prove otherwise in a better environment. Similarly, if he looked a world beater after 17 games in the Storm or Roosters environment, I wouldn’t be singing from the rooftops that he was a future immortal.
It’s just way too early to know either way.
Im fucking asking you!Did i fucking say that?
Has anyone written him off? You accuse me of dodging the question, whilst you are making a series of definitive statements about things other people literally have not said...In isolation, that’s a very fair criticism of Dearden’s game.
However, in the context of the discussion around Dearden being criticised whilst Milford is excepted; Milford didn’t develop his kicking game until around 2017 / 18 (which he has subsequently lost), so around 100 games into his career.
I should be clear, I don’t know if Dearden is the saviour some make him out to be, but I’m sure as shit not going to write him off based on 17 games in the worst Broncos team in history like others are. As far as I’m concerned, he’s fair game if he’s still not delivering when he’s chalked up 50-100 games.
It's not really wrong but it's hardly endearing to a fan.He did nothing wrong. If the Broncos can't beat the Cowboys offer, what has this club come to?
Three in 2019, looked good partnering Milf.Has he even won a first grade game yet?
You're inadvertently providing a case for him to leave the Broncos for a more successful club.It's not really wrong but it's hardly endearing to a fan.
There's nothing inherently wrong with chasing the biggest offer but when you've just cracked your first year and first spoon to go with it, surely there's some humility in giving back to the club for at least another year without whoring yourself to the highest bidder. The club has invested hundreds of thousands up to this point with absolute zero return.
It's not morally wrong or anything but it's just a shit go and kind of reeks of entitlement to be auctioning to the highest bidder when you've achieved absolute **** all. Has he even won a first grade game yet?
Turpin has won us games from halfback, believe it or not. Partnering Darius-cripple-Boyd..and we snuck into 8 when he cameod in the halves....you've achieved absolute **** all. Has he even won a first grade game yet?
You’re right, he is copping it from some. However, I wouldn’t consider what I’ve said to be an unfair line of questioning.I don't keep my compendium of all bhqers statements about players handy so all I can go on is this thread. Looked to me like old mate was copping it for saying Dearden's been average so far which isn't anywhere near saying he's definitively bad. Milford's also been poor the last few years for various reasons but it's true to say he has demonstrated he can perform at a level that Dearden hasn't shown us yet.
In the performative environment of an internet forum some might choose to interpret that as making excuses for one while deathriding the other, particularly if it gives them the chance to enjoy the sweet sweet sensation of laying the boot into another poster but that just seems silly. Likewise the level of hype where saying losing a 20-something gamer will be the death knell for the team is considered sage and balanced while saying they've been average so far and anyone can be replaced is ground for a dozen people to misquote, misinterpret and talk about how they want to punch on.
Personally I'm hoping the combo of Dearden and Milford will prosper this year in a properly coached team that's not ravaged by injury but we'll see. It's certainly not worth getting worked up over.
Well bye then. We shouldn't pander to kids who've achieved nothing. Roosters told Latrell to **** off who is a far better player and was a premiership winner.You're inadvertently providing a case for him to leave the Broncos for a more successful club.
Turpin has won us games from halfback, believe it or not. Partnering Darius-cripple-Boyd..and we snuck into 8 when he cameod in the halves.
This fucking kid better win us games, or I'm death riding him from rnd 1. We have better options, this is not fucking under 8's waiting for his so called 'composure' to translate to try assists then wins.
Jezus, do what the Roosters/Storm are doing - send him back to ISC and develop, come back when your 22 like Grant and only if you're killing it there too
Croft/Gamble/Kelly. The kid gets a callup when all above are injured/sick/dead.Genuine question, who are the better options you are referring to?
You may not get a chance to deathride him in round one - looks to be getting overlooked for croft who is average himself.Turpin has won us games from halfback, believe it or not. Partnering Darius-cripple-Boyd..and we snuck into 8 when he cameod in the halves.
This fucking kid better win us games, or I'm death riding him from rnd 1. We have better options, this is not fucking under 8's waiting for his so called 'composure' to translate to try assists then wins.
Jezus, do what the Roosters/Storm are doing - send him back to ISC and develop, come back when your 22 like Grant and only if you're killing it there too
Ah yes, that would be the Roosters who poached Sam Walker from out of our junior system.Well bye then. We shouldn't pander to kids who've achieved nothing. Roosters told Latrell to **** off who is a far better player and was a premiership winner.
Aubusson has retired.Croft/Gamble/Kelly. The kid gets a callup when all above are injured/sick/dead.
You know how the good teams do it. Sam Walker does not get run if Lam/Aubusson/Hutchison are available.
This would actually be very convenient for you because if/when Milford continues to **** around and just bludge then you can just go from entirely blaming Seibold back to entirely blaming Croft all over again.You may not get a chance to deathride him in round one - looks to be getting overlooked for croft who is average himself.