There have been a few occasions when LEAVING the Broncos has turned your origin career to ****s.
There has also been 1 occasion when playing for the Broncos got you your origin debut, namely Peter Wallace
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...with-the-broncos/story-fni3gmmu-1226867989778
Canberra remind me of a clingy ex girlfriend. "Please stay with us!. we'll do anything for you!!. we'll give you anything! just please stay with us!"
No Cookies | thetelegraph.com.au
Canberra remind me of a clingy ex girlfriend. "Please stay with us!. we'll do anything for you!!. we'll give you anything! just please stay with us!"
Couple of points are interesting in that article...
Apparently the Raiders organised the Milford's accommodation.
Confirmation that the Broncos attempt to rule out the R13 deadline didn't work.
its another nothing article telling us nothing new really.
we all already know that the Raiders are going to do anything they can to keep him and will make him one of the games highest paid players.
Does not mean that the Broncos would not have civil recourse in the case of a backflip. I think this is what the intention of the clause deletion meant. Sure you can backflip before round 13 but it will cost you.Couple of points are interesting in that article...
Apparently the Raiders organised the Milford's accommodation.
Confirmation that the Broncos attempt to rule out the R13 deadline didn't work.
NRL should scrap round 13 contract rule so Anthony Milford has to honour Brisbane Broncos deal
You can’t blame Ricky Stuart for trying, Milford will retire as a giant of the code and I predict he will ultimately be a cross-code star such is his incredible talent and maturity.
He will be to the Broncos what Gareth Widdop has been to the St George Illawarra Dragons.
The Broncos face another brutal examination of their credentials tonight against the Widdop-led St George Illawarra.
If the Broncos had Milford this year, which was the 19-year-old’s first choice, they would be top four contenders.
Under the new laws, class playmakers are thriving.
Even Jamie Soward looks worthy of the “marquee recruit” status he is lauded with at Penrith.
Next year, if Milford ignores the massive offer the Raiders have put to him to stay, he will turn Brisbane into a dynamic team capable of beating the Sydney Roosters not succumbing to late attacking raids.
This dream for Broncos fans could be potentially thwarted by an archaic rule dubbed the anti-tampering deadline, which promotes fan-frustrating deal reneging.
Currently, the NRL refuses to register a contract with a new club until after Round 13 in the final year of that player’s existing contract with his current club.
That leaves the Raiders about nine weeks to convince Milford his veins pump lime green.
But really, Milford has signed with the Broncos and should not be allowed to back track like players such as Greg Inglis, Steve Turner and Josh Papalii have before him.
The more black and white rules we have in rugby league the better.
The edict should be simple – once you have signed, you have signed.
Grown men and their managers are responsible for their decisions and should not be able to stuff clubs around.
Thankfully, I hear Milford will honour his Broncos deal just as he honoured his current Raiders deal.
It is understood Milford’s church elders were the major reason he stayed in Canberra this year, pointing out to him the importance of honouring commitments.
Their advice will be consistent when the Raiders throw the cash at him with increasing fervour in the lead up to round 13.
Source: No Cookies | The Courier-Mail
If what that article says is true, and the Raiders are offering 1.2 million a season, the accepting it would make Milford about the 4th highest earning rugby league player in history ... and certainly the first time in the history of rugby league that a 19 year old has even come close to earning that sort of money