It's painful to read the unfounded drivel Bennet-Boyd haters keep coming up with. It's with amazement that I realise that those kind of posters actually think they are the free thinkers, the enlightened ones. Only they can see clearly while the rest of us simply are not clever enough to understand. One particular poster insists he knows what was said during private conversations between Bennett and Barba, detailing what Bennett said to Barba about his future. Barba failed at fullback and was marginally better at 5/8. He also was surplus to needs and was hideously expensive.That doesn't make sense either, Barba is a Five-Eighth, I thought we already established that.. He played the worst football of any professional football player ever at Fullback last season, played better at Five-Eighth.. signed with the Sharks to play Five-Eighth..
In what sense can he even be considered a Fullback any more?
It's painful to read the unfounded drivel Bennet-Boyd haters keep coming up with.
As opposed to the well reasoned arguments that the Bennett faithful provide? Such as that Barba played the worst football any professional footballer has played in the history of game. Yes, the pro-Bennett people are much more tempered and rational in their comments!
As opposed to the well reasoned arguments that the Bennett faithful provide? Such as that Barba played the worst football any professional footballer has played in the history of game. Yes, the pro-Bennett people are much more tempered and rational in their comments!
That doesn't make sense either, Barba is a Five-Eighth, I thought we already established that.. He played the worst football of any professional football player ever at Fullback last season, played better at Five-Eighth.. signed with the Sharks to play Five-Eighth..
In what sense can he even be considered a Fullback any more?
It was the first time I saw any support from a fullback since KHunt left for afl.
Its pretty simple mate. Barba is a 6. Established. No-one is saying he is a fullback. He was moved on because Boyd was coming to play fullback. That set in stone meant we only had five eighth to fill, and milford and barba to fit in the team. Milford clearly wins that, so barba had to go. 3 into 2 doesnt go.
Without boyd in the equation, barba is 6, milford is 1. That is why us anti bennett ppl are saying barba moved to make way for boyd. Its pretty simple isnt it.
I dont want to argue about barba tho, hes gone. But can people PLEASE stop asking why we suggested barba made way for boyd, because its pretty ****ing easy to figure it out.
And id like to bring up one thing again.
WE ALL AGREE MILFORD WILL END UP AT 6 AND A BIG PART OF COMING HERE WAS TO BE MENTORED BY LOCKYER
BUT
if you actually read any of the articles that you guys keep linking to where milford "says he wants to play 6" you will see (if you actually bother to read past the headline) that he said he saw himself playing 6 when he was much older and bigger. He mentions "the future" a few times and says it will happen when he is bigger. That isnt him saying next year, thats him saying "when i have played fullback for a few years and i get a bit older and slower, i will move". Why else do you think he wants lockyer mentoring him? Coz locky did the same thing. Do you actually think lockyer wouldve been the legend he is had he been forced into 5/8th before he was ready? He wouldve been good, but he wouldnt be the QLD and AUS legend we all know. Milford will be 6, yes, one day. It shouldnt be now. He is going to miss out the years that locky had to develop his game from the back. He is going to be thrown into a higher pressure spot, be relied on far more, and not have the chance to grow like lockyer did.
You all seem to think when he said he will end up there he meant "as soon as i move to brisbane im a 6". Reread it properly. Hes talking long term. Milford will never become the player he could be being forced into 5/8 at such a young age.
Mark my words.
He mentions "the future" a few times and says it will happen when he is bigger. That isnt him saying next year, thats him saying "when i have played fullback for a few years and i get a bit older and slower, i will move".
By the time you read this reply, it will be the future.
p.s - I'd like to congratulate you on establishing yourself as a mind reader.
im not claiming to know what hes thinking mate, i can read the article and i was simply paraphrasing it for the people who clearly only read the headline. I am sick of having to explain the article for you lot. He literally said he wants to play 6 when hes bigger and more experienced. He said that at the end of the 2014 season, so there is literally no way he is referring to next year as the year he wanted to play 5/8th. Simple stuff, but if you would like, PM me and ill explain it in more detail for you.
Actually, i can offer a service for the whole BHQ community. for $5 a week, i will break down foxsports articles for you so you are able to comprehend them. not only will i read the headline i will continue further, and actually get useful info from the article and explain in it a way that any BHQ poster will understand. PM me to begin this subscription. At this stage i only accept paypal